• HOME
  • BUSINESS
Login
Signup
  • News
  • Politics
  • Poll
  • Legal
  • Metro
  • Crime
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Sports
  • Survey
  • NKorea's Kim promises no more nuclear or missile tests
  • Yashwant Sinha quits BJP, says 'democracy under threat'
  • Cabinet nod to ordinance providing death penalty for raping girls below 12
22 Apr, 2018 IST
You are here : Home » Legal
Posted On : 19 Apr, 2017  Source : PTI  Place : New Delhi 
SC invokes constitutional power to transfer Babri Masjid case
"Let justice be done, though the heavens fall", the Supreme Court said today quoting a Latin phrase to invoke its extraordinary constitutional authority to transfer the trial of a case against the VVIP accused from Rae Bareli court to a Lucknow court for joint trial of two sets of cases arising out of the demolition of the Babri Masjid.

The apex court brushed aside the contention of senior BJP leaders L K Advani and M M Joshi that invocation of Article 142 of the Constitution "to do complete justice" to the parties before it, would scuttle their fundamental rights.

The top court said this power exists with it as the judgement delivered by it will finally end the litigation.

A bench of Justices P C Ghose and R F Nariman said it was "without substance" the submission that exercise of Article 142 would scuttle the fundamental rights of the individuals.

"Almost 25 years have gone and yet we are solemnly reminded that respondent nos. 4 and 5's (Advani and Joshi) fundamental rights should not be curtailed by any order passed under Article 142," the bench said.

It said the high court has been given certain powers of transfer under the criminal law but it does not detract the apex court from using the constitutional power under Article 142 to achieve the same end to do complete justice in the matter before it.

Article 142 deals with enforcement of decrees and orders of Supreme Court and orders as to discovery, etc.

The bench said that Article 142(1) has no counterpart in the Government of India Act, 1935 and it does not have any counterpart in any other Constitution world over.

"The Latin maxim fiat 'justitia ruat caelum' is what first comes to mind on a reading of Article 142 Let justice be done though the heavens fall. This Article gives a very wide power to do complete justice to the parties before the court, a power which exists in the Supreme Court because the judgement delivered by it will finally end the litigation between the parties," it said.

"It is, in fact, an Article that turns one of the maxims of equity on its head, namely, that equity follows the law," the bench said.

Elaborating the ambit of Article 142, the bench said that while moulding relief, the court can go to the extent of relaxing the application of law to the parties or exempting altogether the parties from the rigours of the law in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.

"This being so, it is clear that this court has the power, nay, the duty to do complete justice in a case when found necessary," it said.

Advani's counsel had vehemently demanded that his trial should not be transferred from a magisterial court in Rae Bareli to a CBI court in Lucknow as it would take away his right to one appeal.

He had said the case at Rae Bareli involving Advani and other senior BJP leaders was being tried by a first class magistrate and the first appeal lies with the sessions court.

While in the Lucknow case, it is being tried by a sessions court and the appeal lies with the high court.

This submission, however, did not cut much ice with the apex court which observed that the crimes which shake the secular fabric of the Constitution of India have allegedly been committed almost 25 years ago.

"The accused persons have not been brought to book largely because of the conduct of the CBI in not pursuing the prosecution of the alleged offenders in a joint trial, and because of technical defects which were easily curable, but which were not cured by the State Government (Uttar Pradesh)," the bench said.

Additional Solicitor General Neeraj Kishan Kaul, who appeared for the CBI, and senior advocate Kapil Sibal, who was representing intervenor one Haji Mahboob Ahmad (since dead), had favoured joint trial saying the cases arising out of the conspiracy of the same transaction have to be tried together.
HEAD LINES
  • Cabinet nod to ordinance providing death penalty for raping girls below 12
  • Yashwant Sinha quits BJP, says 'democracy under threat'
  • NKorea's Kim promises no more nuclear or missile tests
TOP NEWS
  • Court restrains media from reporting investigation in case against ex-judge Quddusi
  • National Herald: Congress leaders accuse Swamy of defaming them
  • Gangster Abu Salem denied parole to get married
  • SC to hear on Apr 23 pleas on dilution of anti-dowry law
  • Malegaon blast: Purohit can raise UAPA sanction issue before trial, says SC
  • SSC exam: SC asks DOPT Secy to pass reasoned order in six weeks on grievances
  • HC asks West Bengal election commission to reschedule panchayat poll, quahes its notification
  • Jharkhand HC seeks medical reports of Lalu from AIIMS-Delhi
  • HC stays 26/11 trial against Abu Jundal till June 11
  • Decision not to conduct class 10 maths re-exam based on trend analysis: CBSE to HCDecision not to conduct class 10 maths re-exam based on trend analysis: CBSE to HC
  • SC disturbed at MPs raising CJI impeachment issue in public
  • HC acquits Kodnani in riot case; upholds Bajrangi conviction
  • SC dismisses Dawood kin's plea on attachment of properties
  • HC rejects BJP MP's plea to enhance his security
  • Bengal Panchayat poll: HC asks SEC to file affidavits, verdict on Friday
  • Kejriwal discharged in DDCA defamation case
  • Yamuna water: SC summons chief secretaries of Delhi, Haryana
  • Jammu HC Bar Association tells SC it did not support lawyers' protest in Kathua case
  • Loya's death case: SC dismisses pleas for probe, says he died of natural causes
  • SC reserves order on TN doctors' plea for quota in admission to PG courses
  • HC questions Centre's policy exempting autos from having panic buttons
  • SC asks Jay Shah, web portal to try to settle defamation case
  • HC seeks Centre, Delhi govt reply on BJP MLA's plea against Assembly resolution
  • Gujarat HC reserves order in 2002 Ode massacre appeals case
  • 1988 Road rage case: SC reserves verdict on Navjot Singh Sidhu's appeal
  • Fodder scam case: 14 years jail to animal husbandry dept's ex-director
  • Media houses apologise before HC for revealing Kathua victim identity
  • HC irked by North MCD over removal of tree at Chandni Chowk
  • Can convict of one state be jailed in another: HC poser to Delhi govt
  • Ghazipur landfill site: NGT summons commissioners of police, EDMC
  • Decide school safety guidelines in 3 months, SC to Centre
  • Won't stake claim to Taj Mahal: Sunni Wakf Board tells SC
  • Charge sheet filed against four DU students for 'stalking' Smriti Irani
  • Process to appoint eminent jurist to select Lokpal underway: Centre tells SC
Comments
Please signup or login to comment on current news
  • SSC exam: SC asks DOPT Secy to pass reasoned order in six weeks on grievances

© 2018 | All Rights reserved | The First Mail

  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Terms Of Use
  • CONTACT US

Powered by : Gigasoft™