Posted On : 17 Apr, 2017
Source : PTI
Place : New Delhi
Court sets aside order, directs training of spl magistrates

The direction came on an appeal by a restaurant owner against a magisterial court order imposing a fine of Rs 15,000 on him and his manager while holding them guilty under the provisions of Delhi Municipal Corporation (DMC) Act on a complaint by South Delhi Municipal Corporation (SDMC).
Setting aside the order, Additional Sessions Judge Lokesh Kumar Sharma said the offences in this case were triable in a summary manner but the special municipal magistrate (MM) had directly resorted to procedure providing for trial in a summons case.
"This approach of the special MM (Littering) is highly condemnable and cannot be sustained legally in any manner whatsoever," the judge said, adding the "Special MM (Littering) is directed to remain cautious in future and avoid commission of such illegalities in forthcoming matters.
"Trial court record be sent back to the trial court through Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (South-east) with directions to conduct counseling and training sessions of all special MMs (Littering) under his supervision and control so that they get familiar with the correct procedure of law," the judge directed.
The special MM had convicted Karamjeet Singh Puri, owner M/s Red Wok restaurant in Greater Kailash-I here, and its manager Ramchander Verma of offences under DMC Act.
The judge said the order was passed "in a very hasty, criptive and mechanical manner without caring for the established norms of law..."
"It appears that the MM was ignorant of legal procedure to be adopted in such cases and he was not even familiar with penalties to be imposed for violation of said offences after conviction of a person.
"Not only the procedure adopted by the MM was illegal, incorrect and against the settled principles of law and procedure, but also the punishment awarded by him to the appellants herein was also wholly illegal, unjust and uncalled for," the judge said.
The SDMC had in October last year challaned the restaurant for offences under DMC Act alleging that it had encroached upon the MCD land and caused hindrance in the process of sanitation in the vicinity.
The restaurant owner and manager were repeatedly summoned by a special MM (Littering) and asked to pay Rs 15,000 as fine for the alleged offences.
The sessions judge set aside the decision, saying it would have at best constituted an offence of encroachment, but could not have been considered nuisance, as defined in the books of statute, as nobody had ever made any complaint of any annoyance or nuisance being caused by such installation.
In its appeal, the restaurant owner had claimed that the MM had passed the order in a high handed manner without applying its judicious mind, without serving any prior notice upon them and without giving them an opportunity to defend themselves.
TOP NEWS
- Kathua rape-murder: Cop, SPO arrested by SIT move J-K HC
- CBI did not provide evidence for claim of Aseemanand's confession to co-jail inmates: Court
- Dowry has chilling effect on marriage: SC
- SC notice to Centre on plea against criminalisation of homosexuality
- SC stays proceeding against Salman for alleged remarks against a community
- Oppn can't succeed in SC against VP's decision on impeachment: Soli
- CJI, other judges sat at 10.45 AM to undertake court proceedings
- Venkaiah Naidu rejects impeachment notice against CJI
- RS Chairman Naidu starts consultation process on impeachment notice against CJI
- Court restrains media from reporting investigation in case against ex-judge Quddusi
- National Herald: Congress leaders accuse Swamy of defaming them
- Gangster Abu Salem denied parole to get married
- SC to hear on Apr 23 pleas on dilution of anti-dowry law
- Malegaon blast: Purohit can raise UAPA sanction issue before trial, says SC
- SSC exam: SC asks DOPT Secy to pass reasoned order in six weeks on grievances
- HC asks West Bengal election commission to reschedule panchayat poll, quahes its notification
- Jharkhand HC seeks medical reports of Lalu from AIIMS-Delhi
- HC stays 26/11 trial against Abu Jundal till June 11
- Decision not to conduct class 10 maths re-exam based on trend analysis: CBSE to HCDecision not to conduct class 10 maths re-exam based on trend analysis: CBSE to HC
- SC disturbed at MPs raising CJI impeachment issue in public
- HC acquits Kodnani in riot case; upholds Bajrangi conviction
- SC dismisses Dawood kin's plea on attachment of properties
- HC rejects BJP MP's plea to enhance his security
- Bengal Panchayat poll: HC asks SEC to file affidavits, verdict on Friday
- Kejriwal discharged in DDCA defamation case
- Yamuna water: SC summons chief secretaries of Delhi, Haryana
- Jammu HC Bar Association tells SC it did not support lawyers' protest in Kathua case
- Loya's death case: SC dismisses pleas for probe, says he died of natural causes