You are here : Home » Entertainment
Posted On : 20 Mar, 2017  Source : PTI  Place : New Delhi 
Nepotism debate has names associated now, can't talk on it:Kher
Veteran actor Anupam Kher says talking about nepotism would mean either taking the side of Karan Johar or Kangana Ranaut as their name is now associated with the debate.

Kangana kick-started the debate in Bollywood by calling Johar the "flag bearer of nepotism" on his chat show, which led to a war of words between them.

Kher thinks his take on nepotism would have been entirely different if someone had asked him about it before this debate started.

"It's a very generalised statement to make. Now, nepotism has names associated. If someone had asked me this question 20 days back I would have been able to tell something completely different," Kher tells PTI.

"Now, nepotism is what Kangana has said or what Karan is saying. So, anything that I'll say will be either taking her side or his side. But, I think a lot of self-made people are there," he adds.

Kher, who had no god father or family background in Bollywood when he did his first movie "Saaransh" in 1984, says he has gone through a lot of ups and downs in life to achieve what he has today.

"Life does not offer you a smooth path, you have to go through all bends of ups and downs. It took me three years before I got my first film 'Saaransh' and 10 days before the film, I was thrown out of it.

"And I fought back to get that. So, just like in real life, there are some people in this industry as well who like you and then there are some who don't like you. But I think as long as you're a self-made person, it's a great quality," he says.

We need to revisit CBFC's rulebook: Anupam Kher

Veteran actor Anupam Kher says the censor board should revisit its rulebook as it has been more than six decades since those guidelines were written.

Pahlaj Nihalani-led Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC) has been mired in controversies for suggesting arbitrary cuts to the movies. Many prominent filmmakers have demanded changes in the way films are certified in India.

The government has formed a committee, headed by acclaimed filmmaker Shyam Benegal, to come up with suggestions but they are yet to be implemented.

Benegal, on his part, has recommended that there should be two categories of U/A, one plus 12 years of age and one plus 15 years of age and two categories of adult one normal adult and another adult.

Kher, who was the censor chief from October 2003 to 2004, says although Benegal's recommendations should be taken into consideration, he thinks people should not generalise issues as there are so many other positive things that are happening.

"I think we do have liberty in this country. The only thing is that negative things sell and if you don't give importance to those things, no one will even care. These days positive things don't make news. There has to be something negative," Kher, 62, told PTI.

"There are laws and issues everywhere. Yes, certainly we need to revisit certain things. Censor thing should be revisited. The rule book was written in 1952. I don't know what has happened to Shyam Benegal's recommendations. So, all those things we do need," he adds.

The actor believes that it is easy to criticise in life and to make a mountain out of a molehill but people should not ignore the fact that "we're basically just a 68-year-old country and we have reached to whatever level we are, thanks to our resilience and thanks to the kind of people we are." 

Talking about the bans and cuts imposed by CBFC, Kher says, "I think it's very easy to criticise. I'm not saying it doesn't happen but there's a system. We need to revisit our rulebook of CBFC. That's needs to be seen. And that's why the committee (Benegal) was formed for the first time in independent India.

"But I don't know what happened to it. I'd myself released so many films ('Black Friday' and 'Final Solution'). So, that depends on what is your outlook about your life. I'm an eternal optimist." 

Kher says people also use social media as a tool to propagate their "agendas" these days as it has become a platform where "you write something sensational and get noticed".

"I've been on social media for the last five-six years especially on Twitter. I enjoy being part of it and I say what I want to say but I say it with a sense of responsibility. When you are yourself, there are bound to be some people who are not going to be happy about it. These days people have agendas.

"You get your fifteen minutes of fame when you write something sensational but that's not what life is all about.

You need to have longevity," he says.